IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
FAMILY LAW DIVISION - SECTION 14
KELLY R. BURJA,
Petitioner/Mother,
 
v.
 
SHANE CHRISTOPHER BROWN,
Respondent/Father (Pro Se).
___________________________________________/
 
Case No.: 23-009419-FD-14
 
The Honorable Frederick L. Pollack,
Presiding
Exhibit List
Case No. 23-009419-FD-14  •  Filed: March 19, 2026  •  Pre-Trial Filing

I. PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE

Respondent Shane Christopher Brown, pro se, files this Master Exhibit Record in support of Respondent's Pre-Trial Memorandum. This document serves as the unified evidence bank for the case, organizing all documentary evidence into a single indexed filing. All motions and memoranda cite to this Notice by exhibit reference number.

Filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.080 and Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.080. All exhibits are offered to establish the factual foundation for pending motions and to preserve a clean, organized record for the state court's review.

Total Exhibits: 50 (2 Primary Exhibits A-B + 48 Evidence Exhibits C through J-4)

Case Presentation: Exhibit B - 25-slide visual case presentation (PDF file), filed as a companion exhibit to this Notice.


II. THE CHILDREN - WHY THIS FILING EXISTS

Before any exhibit number, any legal citation, or any procedural argument, this filing exists because of two children:

B.M.B.B.R.B.
Date of BirthMarch 4, 2015 (Santa Monica, CA)December 4, 2018 (Tampa, FL)
Current Age11 years old7 years old
Age at Separation8 years old4 years old
Days Without Father847 (as of this filing)847 (as of this filing)
Percentage of Life~21.0% of his entire life~31.8% of his entire life
Birthdays Missed9th, 10th, 11th (March 4, 2026 - 13 days ago)5th, 6th, 7th
Christmases Missed2023, 2024, 20252023, 2024, 2025
Father's Days Missed2024, 20252024, 2025

Total separation: 847 days = 20,328 hours = 2 years, 3 months, 24 days

Zero written court orders suspending contact.
Zero written best-interest findings under § 61.13(2)(c).
Zero written findings of parental unfitness.
Zero written paternity adjudication (despite oral acknowledgment August 9, 2024).
Zero phone calls, video calls, visits, letters, or birthday cards permitted.


III. MASTER EXHIBIT INDEX

Phase 1: Family History & Background (Pre-Case)

ExhibitDocumentDateSignificanceReferenced In
CFather's Day Book - Children's Own Words - authored by B.M.B., expressing the children's relationship with FatherVariousDirect evidence of parent-child bond from the child's own perspective.F2, F5, F8
C-1UCCJEA Affidavit - Sworn Under Perjury Warning - children's DOBs, residence history; identifies Shane as biological father; BOTH Igor AND Kelly signed under explicit perjury warning (§ 92.525)5/16/2024Establishes Father's residential history and active parental presence Dec 2018–Mar 2019. Any false statement constitutes perjury.F2, F5, F8
C-25th Joint Petition for Adoption by Stepparent - filed by Igor Radwanski and Kelly Burja; prepared by K. Dean Kantaras, P.A.; claims father "has not participated meaningfully"; case number and division LEFT BLANK; swears Shane's consent "is attached hereto as Exhibit E" - provably false (Shane never signed any consent)5/16/2024CF-4. 5th adoption attempt while Father actively litigating. False representation of Father's participation. False claim of attached consent. Same counsel represents Mother in paternity AND stepfather in adoption.F2, F5, F6, F8
C-3Paternity Acknowledgment MotionVariousCompanion to Exhibit C-2. Documents paternity acknowledgment proceedings.F2, F5
C-4Judge Pollack Biography - "Captain Child Support" / DOR Career - Inn of Court biography: exclusive career in Title IV-D child support enforcement; "thousands of cases on behalf of the interests" of DOR; no custody, visitation, or parent-child relationship experience documentedVarious/2018Career-long structural focus on financial enforcement. Structural appearance of partiality per Caperton when balancing enforcement vs. parental liberty.F7, F8
C-5Google Search Screenshot - "Captain Child Support" article confirmation from independent online source (inns.innsofcourt.org)VariousThird-party corroboration of the "Captain Child Support" designation.F7, F8

Phase 2: Case Inception & First Obstruction (Dec 2023 – Aug 2024)

ExhibitDocumentDateDay #SignificanceReferenced In
DStepfather Text Messages - "4th time" adoption reference + threatening tone - Igor Radwanski's own texts. Quote: "No problem, wanted to give you a chance to do something honorable for your children for once. Looking forward to your mandatory disclosures and financial affidavit."VariousVariousCF-1 (supporting). Stepfather's own words confirm at least 4 prior adoption attempts, all refused by Father.F2, F5, F6
D-1Adoption-for-Support Quid Pro Quo Letter - sent ONE DAY after 5th adoption petition (Exhibit C-2). Contains: "Kelly Burja is willing to put this whole litigation to rest, as long as you consent to the adoption of B.M.B. and B.R.B.." Also: "Upon your consent... we would be willing to waive past child support obligation."5/17/2024176CF-4. Attorney-authored coercion of parental rights. Offering to waive financial obligations in exchange for constitutional parental termination. Violates § 63.062 (consent cannot be coerced or purchased), FL Bar Rule 4-4.4.F2, F5, F6, F8
D-2Good Faith Letter (Companion Exhibit to Mother's Motion to Compel) - 7-day compliance demand; uses CORRECT email (sb@vizionprotocol.io)7/23/2024243Part of discovery chain. Notable: correct email here, wrong email on later filings.F6
D-3Mother's Motion to Compel (Filing #203762488) - anchors timeline: Dec 13, 2023 demand → Apr 9, 2024 deadline → Jul 23, 2024 good faith letter → Jul 31, 2024 motion filed7/31/2024251Original motion that initiated the discovery/contempt chain.F6
D-4Father's Answer to Petition - filed at August 9, 2024 hearing; Court directed opposing counsel to file it; they did not file it8/9/2024260Father's formal entry into the case. Opposing counsel's failure to file court-directed document is itself a record integrity issue.F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F8

Phase 3: Compliance, Coercion & Denials (Sept 2024 – Dec 2024)

ExhibitDocumentDateDay #SignificanceReferenced In
ECertificate of Parenting Course Completion - Certificate ID: sb1jxxg3nb; completed 36 days BEFORE the October 15, 2024 court deadline9/9/2024291CF-1. Course completed early. Certificate's existence directly contradicts the Feb 3, 2025 false finding.F3, F5, F8
E-1Kantaras Letters (Jul 23 + Oct 1, 2024) - July 23: 7-day ultimatum for financial compliance (signed by Anita Abraham). October 1: signed by K. Dean Kantaras personally (initialed KDK/kk by Kristopher Kaylor); explicitly acknowledges Father's refusal to consent to adoption; states: "If you truly believe that you are capable of being the good father that you say you are, the psychological evaluation and the appointed GAL will show that." Uses wrong email.7/23/2024 + 10/1/2024243 + 313CF-1 (supporting). 14-month coercive correspondence pattern. Zero mention of reunification in any letter. Adoption ultimatum conditioned on surrendering parental rights.F2, F5, F6, F8
E-2Federal ECF 1-1 - Kantaras Oct 1, 2024 Letter (ECF Pages 33–34) - Fee-gating + adoption pressure letter as it appears in the federal filing record10/1/2024313Federal court's own copy of the adoption-GAL quid pro quo letter. Cross-references Exhibit E-1 (verified original).F2, F6, F8
E-3Hearing Transcript - Judicial Statements - Nov 22, 2024: "It doesn't even matter, you're not even the father." Nov 24, 2025: reunification characterized as "only a band aid." Father directed to leave chambers. Neither statement reduced to writing.11/22/2024 + 11/24/2025365 + 732Constitutional Triad - Father denied parental status while held to parental obligations. "Band aid" statement reflects prejudgment of reunification value.F2, F4, F5, F7, F8
E-4Motion to Correct Procedural Record - parenting certificate attached as exhibit; documents "not even the father" statement; documents Shane directed to leave chambers; placed certificate ON DOCKET December 16, 202412/16/2024389CF-2. Certificate was on docket 49 days before Exhibit F-1 falsely stated otherwise. Mother's own exhibit list (Exhibit H-6, Tab 8) confirms this filing existed.F2, F3, F4, F8
E-5Fuchslocher Paralegal Email - "I apologize for our overdue Order... Kris Kaylor is no longer with the firm." Confirms proposed-order drafting practice by opposing counsel.12/27/2024400Confirms attorney turnover. Confirms firm drafted proposed orders for judicial signature.F4, F6
E-6Conformed Order - GAL and Psych Eval DENIED12/31/2024404Court denied the same conditions Petitioner's counsel reinstated via Exhibit I-1 letter one year later without new evidence or court authority.F2, F6

Phase 4: February 2025 Order, Federal Case & Exoneration (Jan 2025 – Jun 2025)

ExhibitDocumentDateDay #SignificanceReferenced In
FMother's Motion for Contempt and Sanctions (Filing #215532998) - claims "willful" non-compliance; Certificate of Service uses WRONG email (sb@vizionprotoc.io - missing 'l'); filed 6 days before the False Finding Order1/28/2025432June 2, 2025 Order later found NO credible evidence of willful noncompliance. Service may be defective.F3, F6
F-1February 3, 2025 Order (THE FALSE FINDING) - states parenting certificate "does not appear from the docket"; imputes income at $61,440/yr without § 61.30(2)(b) findings; denies Father's Emergency Motion for Time-Sharing; imposes fee-conditioned contact chain2/3/2025438CF-1. Binary factual error - certificate filed 49 days earlier (Exhibit E-4). Income imputation without required findings. Triggered entire downstream enforcement chain.F2, F3, F7, F8
F-2Federal § 1983 Complaint - Brown v. FL Dep't of Revenue, No. 8:25-cv-00621 (M.D. Fla.) - Judge Pollack named defendant; due process + equal protection + parental rights claims; defended by FL Attorney General3/14/2025477Judge simultaneously adjudicating this state case while defending himself in federal § 1983 litigation by the same party. Canon 3E.F7, F8
F-3Federal Exhibit List Phase 1 (ECF 1-1, 259 pages) - Full Phase 1 federal exhibit index3/14/2025477Federal exhibit structure documentation.F8
F-4Federal ECF 1-1 - Phase 1 Exhibit Screenshots (P1-A through P1-G) - iPhone screenshots of federal complaint Phase 1 exhibit index pages from PACER Document 1-1 (259 pages)3/14/2025477Visual documentation of Phase 1 federal exhibit structure. Cross-references Exhibit F-3 (full ECF 1-1 PDF).F8
F-5Federal ECF 1-1 - Complaint Narrative Pages (Pages 36–50+) - Sequential screenshots of the federal complaint narrative from ECF Document 1-13/14/2025477Full complaint narrative as filed. 12 sequential page screenshots documenting Father's federal due process, equal protection, and parental rights claims.F7, F8
GKDK Good Faith Letter (Apr 2, 2025)4/2/2025496Good faith correspondence from opposing counsel.F6
G-1Proposed Contempt Order - REFUSED BY JUDGE - Court response: "After review, not signed. Court will be entering its own order." Submitted by Matthew J. Loscher (Kantaras firm)5/29/2025553CF-3 (supporting). Even the Court found Petitioner's proposed contempt order could not be signed.F2, F3
G-2Order Granting-In-Part Motion for Enforcement - "no credible competent substantial evidence" of willful noncompliance; no ability to pay; contempt DENIED; sanctions DENIED; fees DENIED6/2/2025557CF-2. Court's own finding vindicates Father. Enforcement continues without new findings. Irreconcilable with Feb 3 income imputation.F2, F3, F5, F7, F8
G-3"Wife's" Motion to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem (Filing #224658090) - falsely designates Petitioner as "Wife" (never married); proposes Mr. Melendez ($275/hr) as counsel's chosen GAL; REFILED 194 days after Court denied GAL; Certificate of Service uses WRONG email (sb@vizionprotoc.io - missing 'l')6/4/2025559False designation in sworn, notarized filing. Refiling previously denied relief without new evidence. Possible defective service under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.516.F2, F4, F6, F8
G-4Notice of Federal Litigation Filed in State Court - cross-notice; sworn declaration of pending federal action6/10/2025567Establishes that this Court has been formally notified of the pending federal action against Judge Pollack.F7, F8

Phase 5: Manipulation, Exhibit Fraud & Hearings (Jul 2025 – Nov 2025)

ExhibitDocumentDateDay #SignificanceReferenced In
HFederal ECF Doc 46 - confirms Judge Pollack as defendant in federal case2025-Federal docket confirmation.F7
H-1Notice of Hearing - 5 Coordination Attempts documented in footnote (Aug 26, 27, 28, Sep 2, Sep 5, 2025); contains incarceration/jail threat language9/10/2025657DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS Exhibit H-3. Father was NOT "completely unresponsive" - he made 5 documented outreach attempts in the same period.F4, F6, F8
H-2Federal Stay Order - case stayed but NOT dismissed; all claims preserved; judge remains active defendant9/19/2025666Federal claims remain live. Stay may be lifted based on continued state court violations.F7, F8
H-3Harrer Email - "Completely Unresponsive" - Danielle Harrer (Kantaras firm) emails judicial coordinator claiming Respondent was "completely unresponsive"10/2/2025679CF-4 (supporting). DIRECTLY CONTRADICTED by 5 documented coordination attempts in Exhibit H-1. FL Bar Rule 4-3.3(a)(1) (candor to tribunal).F4, F6, F8
H-4"Wife's" Exhibit List - 14 Tabs - presented at October 16, 2025 hearing (Hearing #1); title uses false "Wife" designation (parties never married); includes retainer agreement (Tab 13) and invoices (Tab 14)10/16/2025693CF-3 (baseline exhibit). Original binder. Financial docs in Tabs 13-14 were removed from the Exhibit H-6 binder.F2, F4, F6, F8
H-5Burja Notice of Hearing (GAL) - documents 7 coordination attempts by Father with opposing counsel10/24/2025701Further evidence Father was responsive and cooperative.F4, F6, F8
H-6"Mother's" Exhibit List - 14 Tabs (12 of 14 DIFFERENT from Exhibit H-4) - presented at November 24, 2025 hearing (Hearing #2); title changed from "Wife's" to "Mother's"; Tab 8 changed to include Father's own Motion to Correct (Exhibit E-4) without notice11/24/2025732CF-3. 12 tabs materially changed without disclosure or meet-and-confer. Judge acknowledged different binders on the record.F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F8
H-7Hearing Transcript - Court's on-record acknowledgment of different binders between Oct 16 and Nov 24 hearings11/24/2025732Judge was AWARE of binder discrepancy and took NO corrective action.F4

Phase 6: 730-Day Written Acknowledgment & Current Proceedings (Dec 2025 – Present)

ExhibitDocumentDateDay #SignificanceReferenced In
IFather's Dec 17, 2025 Good Faith Email - Christmas Contact Request - 4 specific requests (phone/video, Christmas overnights, 50/50 schedule, coordination call), zero conditions; documents all three prior conditions removed (GAL denied, psych eval denied, drug testing withdrawn); voluntary drug test offer; full financial cooperation offer; Dec 19 response deadline set12/17/2025755Establishes Father's documented good faith the day before KDK's 730-day letter (Exhibit I-1). Contrast between Father's cooperative posture and opposing counsel's conditional demands is dispositive.F2, F5, F8
I-1Kantaras Letter - 730-Day Written Admission - signed by K. Dean Kantaras personally; admits "lack of meaningful communication in the past 730 days"; conditions access on psych eval + drug screen "approved by us"; cc: Kelly Burja. No mention of reunification.12/18/2025756CF-5. Binding party admission. Opposing counsel's own written acknowledgment of 730+ day deprivation (actual count: 756 days). Conditions fundamental rights on finances.F2, F3, F5, F6, F8
I-2Kantaras Dec 18, 2025 Response - 730-Day Written Acknowledgment + 3 Unauthorized Conditions - KDK's response to Father's Dec 17 good faith email (Exhibit I). Admits "lack of meaningful communication in the past 730 days." Reinstates psych eval + drug screen + GAL-style conditions - all previously court-denied (Exhibit E-6). Screenshots of full letter.12/18/2025756Companion to Exhibit I-1 (the letter PDF). Exhibit I-2 provides the screenshot evidence of the full letter in context. Proves voluntary cessation was tactical - every demand abandoned in Oct 2025 reinstated 76 days later.F2, F3, F5, F6, F8
I-3Order Setting Continued In-Person Evidentiary Hearing - references 2+ year case duration; sets Jan 16, 2026 hearing1/14/2026783Court's own acknowledgment of case duration.F2, F4
I-4Shane's Email to Court - 11 Substantive Issues - received by Court Jan 16, 2026 at 12:21 PM; only 1 of 11 issues addressed (continuance); 10 remain unaddressed and preserved for appeal~1/10/2026~77910 of 11 issues preserved for appellate review. Court initially stated Shane "did not appear" - then "discovered" the email.F2, F8
I-5Order Granting Motion for Continuance + Setting Pre-Trial Conference - March 19, 2026 deadline; April 2, 2026 hearing at 1:30 PM; only 1 of 11 issues addressed; sanctions warning; AI note-takers prohibited1/16/2026785Governs all deadlines. 10 of 11 issues remain unaddressed.All Filings

Phase 7: Reference Materials

ExhibitDocumentDateSignificanceReferenced In
J-1Motion for Clarification (condensed)VariousCondensed motion for clarification of record.F4
J-2Father's Official Exhibit ListVariousFather's formal exhibit list filed with the Court.F2, F4
J-3Father's Proposed Parenting Plan - graduated contact restoration plan filed by Father2025Father's affirmative proposal for reunification. Demonstrates good faith and willingness to work within the system.F2, F5
J-4Federal ECF 1-1 - Phase 2 Exhibit Screenshots (F2-A through F2-F) - Phase 2 exhibit index pages from federal complaint3/14/2025Visual documentation of Phase 2 federal exhibit structure.F8
J-5Certificate of Service TemplateVariousTemplate for service documentation.-

Text Message Evidence

ExhibitDocumentDateSignificanceReferenced In
Exhibits A–T20 Text Message Exhibits - complete documented contact record between Father and Mother/Stepfather. Documents: Father's repeated contact attempts; offers of financial support ("take my money"); co-parenting proposals; stepfather's threatening communications; evidence of domestic violence by stepfather2022–202420 documented contact attempts. Directly contradicts narrative of abandonment. Contains evidence of DV by stepfather.F2, F5, F8

Case Presentation

ExhibitDocumentSignificanceReferenced In
Exhibit B25-Slide Visual Case Presentation - EXHIBIT-B-CASE-PRESENTATION.html (265 KB, self-contained). Covers: 847-day timeline, 6 critical evidentiary findings, Constitutional Triad, SB 1128 comparison, 11-item relief request, full exhibit cross-references. Labeled "EXHIBIT B" on all 25 slides.Visual summary of the entire case for judicial and appellate review. Every data point sourced from Exhibits C through J-4. Zero words of content are unsupported by the documentary record.F1 (this filing)

IV. VERIFIED CASE TIMELINE - DAY-BY-DAY RECORD

Day Zero: November 23, 2023 - last contact with B.M.B. (age 8) and B.R.B. (age 4).

Pre-Case History (2015–2023)

DateEventSourceExhibit
Mar 4, 2015B.M.B. born, Santa Monica, CA[SWORN] UCCJEAExhibit C-1
Dec 4, 2018B.R.B. born, Tampa, FL[SWORN] UCCJEAExhibit C-1
Dec 2018 – Mar 2019Father lived with Mother and both children at 700 Dockview Way, Apt 1321, Tampa FL[SWORN] UCCJEAExhibit C-1
Mar 20, 2021Mother marries Igor Radwanski in St. Petersburg, FL[SWORN] Adoption PetitionExhibit C-2
2021–2023Four adoption attempts by stepfather - all refused by Father[SWORN] Mother's admission + [EVIDENCE] Exhibit D texts ("4th time")Exhibit D

2023 - Case Inception

DateDay #EventSourceExhibitCF
Nov 23, 20230LAST CONTACT. Father's final contact with B.M.B. (8) and B.R.B. (4). Total separation begins. No court order.[EVIDENCE] All docsMultipleAll
Dec 15, 202322Petition for Paternity filed by Mother. Request-Demand for Mandatory Disclosure filed.[FILED]Exhibit H-4, Exhibit H-6-

2024 - Compliance, Adoption, Attorney Turnover

DateDay #EventSourceExhibitCF
May 16, 20241755th Adoption Petition filed by stepfather + Mother. Same attorney. Case # LEFT BLANK. Claims Father "has not participated meaningfully." False claim of attached consent (Exhibit E).[FILED]Exhibit C-2, Exhibit C-1CF-4
May 17, 2024176Quid pro quo letter: "Consent to adoption... we waive child support." ONE DAY after petition.[ATTORNEY]Exhibit D-1CF-4
Jul 23, 20242437-day financial ultimatum letter (Anita Abraham). Zero mention of children's wellbeing.[ATTORNEY]Exhibit E-1CF-5
Jul 31, 2024251Mother's Motion to Compel filed.[FILED]Exhibit D-3-
Aug 9, 2024260Father orally acknowledges paternity. Files Answer. Court directs opposing counsel to file it - they do not.[FILED]Exhibit D-4, Exhibit E-4-
Aug 23, 2024274Father files Motion for Extension; provides proof of health/dental insurance for children.[FILED]Exhibit E-4-
Sep 9, 2024291Parenting course COMPLETED - 36 days BEFORE court deadline. Certificate ID: sb1jxxg3nb.[EVIDENCE]Exhibit ECF-1
Oct 1, 2024313Certificate provided to opposing counsel (Kris Kaylor) per judge's instruction.[EVIDENCE]Exhibit E-4CF-1
Oct 1, 2024313Kantaras "or-else" letter - adoption refusal linked to GAL/psych eval conditions. Wrong email used.[ATTORNEY]Exhibit E-1CF-5
Oct 15, 2024327Court deadline for parenting course - already completed 36 days earlier.[COURT ORDER]-CF-1
Nov 22, 2024365"It doesn't even matter, you're not even the father." Kris Kaylor admits unaware of certificate. GAL + psych eval DENIED. Father directed to leave chambers.[EVIDENCE]Exhibit E-3, Exhibit E-4CF-1
Dec 16, 2024389Certificate placed ON DOCKET via Motion to Correct Procedural Record. Mother's own exhibit list (Exhibit H-6 Tab 8) confirms.[FILED]Exhibit E-4CF-1
Dec 27, 2024400Fuchslocher email: "overdue Order... Kris Kaylor is no longer with the firm."[EMAIL]Exhibit E-5CF-1
Dec 31, 2024404GAL and Psych Eval formally DENIED by written order.[COURT ORDER]Exhibit E-6-

2025 - February Order, Federal Action, Exoneration, Hearings

DateDay #EventSourceExhibitCF
Jan 28, 2025432Mother files Motion for Contempt - wrong email in COS. 6 days before False Finding.[FILED]Exhibit FCF-2
Jan 31, 2025435Father files Emergency Motion for Time-Sharing - STILL PENDING 13+ months.[FILED]Docket-
Feb 3, 2025438February 3, 2025 Order - Record Discrepancy. Certificate "does not appear from the docket" - 49 days after Exhibit E-4 placed it there. Income imputed $61,440/yr without § 61.30(2)(b) findings. Emergency time-sharing DENIED. Contact conditioned on financial compliance.[COURT ORDER]Exhibit F-1CF-1
Mar 14, 2025477Federal § 1983 complaint filed. Judge Pollack named defendant. Defended by FL Attorney General.[FILED]Exhibit F-2-
May 27, 2025551Bodily attachment order - no notice to Father, no hearing, no ability-to-pay finding.[COURT ORDER]DocketCF-2
May 29, 2025553Court REFUSES to sign proposed contempt order. "After review, not signed."[EVIDENCE]Exhibit G-1CF-2
Jun 2, 2025557EXONERATION: NO willful misconduct, NO ability to pay. Contempt DENIED. Sanctions DENIED. Fees DENIED.[COURT ORDER]Exhibit G-2CF-2
Jun 4, 2025559"Wife's" GAL Motion refiled - 194 days after denial. Wrong email. False "Wife" designation.[FILED]Exhibit G-3CF-3
Sep 10, 2025657Notice of Hearing filed - 5 coordination attempts documented in footnote.[FILED]Exhibit H-1CF-3
Sep 19, 2025666Federal case STAYED - remains LIVE. Judge Pollack remains defendant.[COURT ORDER]Exhibit H-2-
Oct 2, 2025679"Completely unresponsive" - Harrer email to court. Directly contradicted by Exhibit H-1.[EMAIL]Exhibit H-3CF-3
Oct 16, 2025693Hearing #1 - "Wife's" exhibit list (Exhibit H-4). 14 tabs. Father testified 2 hours. Cross cut off at 4:30 PM (11 min remaining).[EVIDENCE]Exhibit H-4CF-3
Nov 24, 2025732Hearing #2 - DIFFERENT exhibit list (Exhibit H-6). 12 of 14 tabs changed. Judge acknowledged different binders on record. Mother's 6 sworn admissions. "Band aid" statement. Cross began 3:19 PM, cut off 3:30 PM. 11 minutes remaining.[EVIDENCE] [SWORN]Exhibit H-6, Exhibit E-3#3, #4
Dec 18, 2025756730-day written admission. Kantaras letter. Access conditioned on psych eval + drug screen "approved by us." Zero mention of reunification.[ATTORNEY]Exhibit I-1CF-5

2026 - Current Proceedings

DateDay #EventSourceExhibitCF
~Jan 10, 2026~779Father sends 11-issue email to Court. Only 1 addressed (continuance). 10 preserved.[EMAIL]Exhibit I-4-
Jan 16, 2026785Continuance to April 2. 10 of 11 issues unaddressed.[COURT ORDER]Exhibit I-5-
Mar 4, 2026832B.M.B.'s 11th birthday - 3rd consecutive without Father.---
Mar 19, 2026847THIS FILING. 847 days. 20,328 hours.--All
Mar 19, 2026847Pre-Trial Memorandum deadline. 5:00 PM.Exhibit I-5--
Apr 2, 2026861Evidentiary Hearing. 1:30 PM. Courtroom 421, 315 Court St, Clearwater FL 33756. Day 861 = 20,664 hours.Exhibit I-5--

V. THE SIX CRITICAL EVIDENTIARY FINDINGS

Each finding is a binary, verifiable fact - not an opinion, not an interpretation. Each can be confirmed from the Court's own records.

CF-1 - THE SETUP - SERVICE AMBUSH

ElementFact
What happenedNov. 22, 2023: retainer signed by Mother (reflected in Mother's own exhibit). Nov. 23: final visit between Father and children. Nov.–Feb.: Mother communicated with Father via text throughout. Feb. 2024: Mother arranged a meeting - children were never there - process server delivered papers.
Binary proofAt Nov. 2024 cross-examination, Mother claimed she "couldn't reach him" - directly contradicted by months of her own text messages entered into the record.
Core ExhibitsExhibit C-1 (UCCJEA - retainer date), Exhibit H-4 (Mother's exhibit list showing retainer, Tab 13), Exhibit D (text messages)
ConsequenceThe case was built on a fabricated narrative of unreachability - disproven by the opposing party's own communications.
Legal authorityFL Bar Rule 4-3.3(a)(1) - candor toward the tribunal; Fla. Stat. § 57.105 - sanctions for unsupported claims

CF-2 - RECORD DISCREPANCY

ElementFact
What happenedFeb 3, 2025 Order (Exhibit F-1) states parenting course certificate "does not appear from the docket"
Why it's falseCertificate was filed on docket December 16, 2024 via Exhibit E-4 - 49 days before the order
Binary proofMother's own Nov 24, 2025 exhibit list (Exhibit H-6, Tab 8) includes Father's Motion to Correct (Exhibit E-4) - confirming the certificate was known to exist
Core ExhibitsExhibit E (certificate), Exhibit F-1 (false order), Exhibit E-4 (motion to correct)
ConsequenceEmergency time-sharing DENIED. Income imputed at $61,440/yr. Contact conditioned on financial compliance. All flowing from a verifiably false premise.
Legal authorityFla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b)(3) - relief from judgment based on fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct

CF-3 - CONTEMPT FINDING

ElementFact
What happenedCourt found NO willful misconduct, NO ability to pay on June 2, 2025 (Exhibit G-2)
Why it mattersEnforcement posture continues unchanged despite the Court's own exoneration. Proposed contempt order REFUSED by judge on May 29 (Exhibit G-1).
Core ExhibitsExhibit G-2 (exoneration order), Exhibit G-1 (refused proposed order), Exhibit F-1 (income imputation)
Legal authorityTurner v. Rogers, 564 U.S. 431 (2011); Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 (1983)

CF-4 - EXHIBIT MODIFICATION

ElementFact
What happened12 of 14 tabs changed between hearings without disclosure. "Completely unresponsive" claimed while 5 coordination attempts were documented.
Binary proofExhibit H-4 vs. Exhibit H-6 - side-by-side comparison shows 12 different tabs. Exhibit H-3 vs. Exhibit H-1 - "unresponsive" claim vs. 5 documented attempts.
Core ExhibitsExhibit H-4, Exhibit H-6 (two exhibit lists), Exhibit H-3 (Harrer email), Exhibit H-1 (coordination attempts)
Legal authorityFL Bar Rules 4-3.3(a)(1), 4-3.4(a)(b), 4-8.4(c)(d); Fla. Stat. § 117.05

CF-5 - MOTHER'S SWORN ADMISSIONS

ElementFact
What happenedUnder oath at the November 24, 2025 hearing, Mother admitted: withholding children from Father; making negative statements about Father to the children; physical abuse of children by Stepfather; five stepparent adoption attempts; claim of "never received" financial support contradicted by texts read into the record.
Binary proofSix sworn admissions on the record. None have been addressed in any written finding or order. FL § 61.13(2)(c)(13) requires written findings on negative statements. FL § 61.13(2)(c)(14) requires findings on domestic violence.
Core ExhibitsExhibit E-3 (Nov 22, 2024 transcript - "not even the father"), Exhibit H-7 (Nov 24, 2025 transcript - six sworn admissions)
Legal authorityFla. Stat. § 61.13(2)(c)(13) & (14); Keitel v. Keitel, 716 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)

CF-6 - 730-DAY WRITTEN ACKNOWLEDGMENT

ElementFact
What happenedOpposing counsel's own letter admits "730 days" without "meaningful communication" - with NO court order, NO best-interest findings, NO fitness adjudication
Binary proofExhibit I-1 - K. Dean Kantaras's own signature. Actual count at writing: 756 days (understated by 26).
Core ExhibitsExhibit I-1 (admission letter), Exhibit I (Father's zero-condition email), Exhibit I-2 (three unauthorized conditions reinstated)
Legal authority14th Amendment due process; Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000); Fla. Stat. § 61.13(2)(c)

VI. EMAIL SERVICE DEFECT - THREE FILINGS

The following filings contain the WRONG email address (sb@vizionprotoc.io - missing the letter 'l') in the Certificate of Service:

FilingDateCorrect EmailImplication
Exhibit G-3 - GAL Motion6/4/2025sb@vizionprotocol.ioService may be defective under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.516
Exhibit F - Motion for Contempt1/28/2025sb@vizionprotocol.ioService may be defective - this filing preceded the False Finding Order by 6 days
Exhibit E-1 - Oct 1, 2024 Letter10/1/2024sb@vizionprotocol.ioWrong email used in attorney correspondence

If any enforcement action relies on service through these filings, service of process may be defective.


VII. MOTHER'S SIX SWORN ADMISSIONS - November 24, 2025

At the November 24, 2025 hearing (Day 732), Petitioner Kelly Burja admitted under oath (Exhibit H-6; Exhibit E-3):

1. Withholding: She withheld the children from Father for 730+ days - with no court order directing her to do so [§ 61.13(2)(c)(1), (3)]

2. Refusal to co-parent: She did not engage in co-parenting and refused to communicate with Father [§ 61.13(2)(c)(1)]

3. Negative statements: She made negative statements about Father to the children - directly implicating § 61.13(2)(c)(1) (facilitation of parent-child relationship) [§ 61.13(2)(c)(14)]

4. Domestic violence: She was physically abused by stepfather Igor Radwanski on multiple occasions - the man currently residing with and raising the children. Implicates § 61.13(2)(c)(13) (evidence of domestic violence) and § 39.201 (mandatory reporting). This Court has a mandatory reporting obligation under § 39.201 that has not been fulfilled in the 129 days since this admission was made on the record. [§ 61.13(2)(c)(13); § 39.201]

5. Adoption pattern: The stepfather pursued five adoption attempts to legally eliminate Father - all while Father was fighting in court. Implicates § 63.062 (consent cannot be coerced) [§ 63.062; § 61.13(2)(c)(14)]

6. Financial contradiction: Father DID provide financial support - directly contradicting her earlier sworn financial affidavit and testimony that she "never" received support. Texts read into the record at the same hearing proved otherwise. [§ 61.30(2)(b)]

None of these six admissions have been addressed in any written finding or order.


VIII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAD - Written Clarification Required

§ 61.13(2)(c) Best-Interest Factor Analysis

Florida Statute § 61.13(2)(c) mandates written findings on 20 best-interest factors before any modification of time-sharing. After 847 days, zero factors have been addressed in any written order.

FactorDescriptionEvidence in RecordExhibitWritten Finding
(1)Capacity to facilitate parent-child relationshipMother admitted: refused to co-parent, made negative statementsH-6, E-3NONE
(3)Continuity, stability, permanence847 days zero contact with no written planTimelineNONE
(8)Anticipated division of parental responsibilitiesNever addressed in any order-NONE
(10)Geographic viability of parenting planFather and children in same metro area; no geographic barrierC-1NONE
(13)Evidence of domestic violence, child abuseMother's sworn admission: DV by stepfather currently raising childrenH-6, E-3NONE
(14)Evidence of parental alienation4 letters over 19 months, zero reunification mentions; negative statementsD-1, E-1, I-1NONE
(19)Child's preference if sufficiently matureB.M.B. age 11; Father's Day Book expressing bondCNONE

Result: Zero of 20 mandatory factors addressed. The statutory obligation is not discretionary - it is mandatory before any deviation from equal time-sharing.


This Court has simultaneously occupied three irreconcilable positions:

(1) Treated Respondent as a NON-FATHER for contact purposes:

(2) Treated Respondent as a FATHER for financial enforcement purposes:

(3) Provided him the due process of NEITHER status:

No constitutional classification theory permits this contradictory posture. Written findings must clarify which status applies and the legal basis for the current regime.


IX. SB 1128 - THE LEGISLATURE'S VERDICT

Florida Senate Bill 1128 (effective July 1, 2026; committee vote 11-0) was passed to prevent cases exactly like this one:

This Case (847 Days)SB 1128 Requirement
No parenting hearing for 847 daysHearing within 30 days of initial pleading
No temporary parenting planParenting plan within 60 days
Emergency motion pending 13+ monthsEnforcement hearing within 5 business days
Mediation used as blocking mechanismMediation requires both parties' consent
Default rule gives Mother sole custody by silenceDefault rule REPEALED - § 742.031(2) eliminated
No public accountabilityOSCA reports compliance data to Legislature annually

SB 1128 does not apply retroactively. But the rights it codifies - frequent and continuing contact, equal timesharing presumption, written findings, no unilateral mediation gates - existed in § 61.13 and the Constitution before this case was filed. SB 1128 is the Legislature's acknowledgment that those rights were being violated in cases like this one.

847 days. The Legislature gave courts 60. The gap is 787 days. That gap has two names: B.M.B. and B.R.B..


X. LEGAL AUTHORITIES - CONSOLIDATED REFERENCE

A. Florida Statutory Framework (Primary Authority)

B. Federal Constitutional Support (Appellate Backstop)

CaseCitationEstablishes
Santosky v. Kramer455 U.S. 745 (1982)Fundamental liberty interest; clear and convincing evidence required; parental rights don't evaporate absent model parenting
Troxel v. Granville530 U.S. 57 (2000)Parental liberty among oldest fundamental interests; presumption of parental fitness
Stanley v. Illinois405 U.S. 645 (1972)Unwed father's constitutional rights; cannot presume unfitness because parents were unmarried
Caban v. Mohammed441 U.S. 380 (1979)Gender-based parental rights distinctions require heightened scrutiny; father's right to object to adoption
Turner v. Rogers564 U.S. 431 (2011)Ability-to-pay required before civil contempt for non-payment
Bearden v. Georgia461 U.S. 660 (1983)Cannot incarcerate for inability to pay without willfulness finding
M.L.B. v. S.L.J.519 U.S. 102 (1996)Parental rights proceedings cannot be conditioned on ability to pay
Mathews v. Eldridge424 U.S. 319 (1976)Procedural due process three-factor balancing test
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez372 U.S. 144 (1963)Civil sanctions that become punitive require criminal due process protections
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.556 U.S. 868 (2009)Due process requires not only impartiality but appearance of impartiality
Liteky v. United States510 U.S. 540 (1994)Extrajudicial source doctrine for judicial bias
Pierce v. Society of Sisters268 U.S. 510 (1925)Parents' liberty to direct upbringing of children

Florida Statutes

StatuteRequirement
§ 61.13(2)(a)Written order required to modify time-sharing
§ 61.13(2)(c)20 mandatory best-interest factors for time-sharing determinations
§ 61.13(2)(c)(1)Each parent's capacity to facilitate parent-child relationship
§ 61.13(2)(c)(2)Each parent's capacity to provide consistent routine
§ 61.13(2)(c)(13)Evidence of domestic violence, abuse, neglect
§ 61.30(2)(b)Written findings required before imputing income
§ 63.062Biological father's consent to adoption cannot be coerced or purchased
§ 63.087Stepparent adoption procedure
§ 39.201Mandatory reporting of child abuse or neglect
§ 38.10Grounds for disqualification of judge
§ 57.105Sanctions for frivolous claims or defenses
§ 117.05False acknowledgments in notarized documents
§ 92.525Perjury - false statements under oath

Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

RulePurpose
Rule 1.080Filing and service of pleadings
Rule 1.520Mandatory written findings of fact and conclusions of law
Rule 1.540(b)Relief from judgment - fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct
Rule 12.080Family law written findings requirement
Rule 12.510Family law findings

Florida Bar Rules of Professional Conduct

RuleObligation
4-3.3(a)(1)Candor toward the tribunal - no false statements of fact
4-3.4(a)(b)(c)Fairness to opposing party - no altering/concealing evidence
4-4.1Truthfulness in statements to others
4-4.4Respect for rights of third persons
4-8.4(c)(d)Misconduct - dishonesty, fraud; conduct prejudicial to justice
4-1.7Conflict of interest - concurrent representation

Canon 3E - Florida Code of Judicial Conduct

Requires disqualification where impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including financial interest, personal bias, or when the judge is a party to the proceeding.

Federal

42 U.S.C. § 1983 - Civil rights action against persons acting under color of state law.


XI. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS

Respondent reserves the right to supplement this record as additional evidence becomes available, including but not limited to transcripts of the October 16, 2025 and November 24, 2025 hearings, federal court orders, and any newly discovered evidence of attorney or judicial misconduct.

This Notice does not constitute a waiver of any right, claim, or defense - including but not limited to all constitutional claims and all claims pending in Brown v. Florida Dep't of Revenue, No. 8:25-cv-00621 (M.D. Fla.).


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal and/or electronic mail to:

K. Dean Kantaras, P.A.
attorneys@kantaraslaw.com
danielle@kantaraslaw.com
gabrielle@kantaraslaw.com

on this 19th day of March, 2026.

_________________________________
SHANE CHRISTOPHER BROWN
Respondent, Pro Se
sb@vizionprotocol.io


APPENDIX A: 14-TAB SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON (Exhibit H-4 vs. Exhibit H-6)

TabOctober 16, 2025 (Exhibit H-4) "WIFE'S"November 24, 2025 (Exhibit H-6) "MOTHER'S"Status
1Petition for Paternity 12/15/2023Petition for Paternity 12/15/2023SAME
2Kelly Burja Financial Affidavit 3/31/2025Request-Demand + Financial AffidavitDIFFERENT
3Request-Demand for ComplianceSummons: Personal Service 12/15/2023DIFFERENT
4Certificate of Nonappearance 05/20/2024Certificate of Nonappearance 05/20/2024SAME
5Motion to Compel (Amended) 09/10/2024Mother's Motion to Compel 07/31/2024DIFFERENT - different date
6Order Granting Amended Motion 01/14/2025Motion for Extension of Time 08/23/2024DIFFERENT - Father's motion as Petitioner's exhibit
7Mother's Motion for Contempt 01/28/2025Mother's Amended Motion to Compel 9/10/2024DIFFERENT
8Order Granting in Part 06/02/2025Father's Motion to Correct Record 12/16/2024DIFFERENT - Father's filing presented as Petitioner's exhibit
9Order Handling Emergency Motion 02/03/2025Order Granting Amended Motion 01/14/2025DIFFERENT
10Certificate of Nonappearance 07/10/2025Mother's Motion for Contempt 01/28/2025DIFFERENT
11Motion for Contempt + to Strike 08/20/2025Emergency Motion Handling Order 02/03/2025DIFFERENT
12Order Setting Hearing 10/10/2025Order Granting-in-part Motion 06/02/2025DIFFERENT
13Retainer Agreement (redacted)Certificate of Nonappearance 07/10/2025DIFFERENT - financial docs REMOVED
14Invoices (redacted)Motion for Contempt and to Strike 08/20/2025DIFFERENT - financial docs REMOVED

Result: 12 of 14 tabs contain materially different documents. Tabs 13 and 14 - financial documents (retainer agreement and invoices) - were removed entirely from the second binder without disclosure or meet-and-confer. No explanation has been provided. No sanctions have been imposed.